Field-test log · the.net.im
Ten labs.llc tools, run against the live wire and logged to the second.
The Wire Test reviews tools the way a test engineer signs off a line. Every probe gets a UTC stamp, every answer is written down as it came back, and every log closes with the faults we found. On 27 September 2026 we ran ten tools from labs.llc one after another, and set each beside two or three rivals on the open web.
Published by LABS, the studio that builds labs.llc, so every tool here is our own. The method explains what that means for how you read us.
Session · 27 Sep 2026
- R01Treasury
- R02Look-alike scanner
- R03Filings
- R04Backgammon
- R05Portal
- R06Airports
- R07Docket
- R08Hanta
- R09Asteroids
- R10Recall
→ · 10 runs · 22 rival pages checked · 42 faults logged
The session
Run by run, in the order we ran them
Each stamp marks the first probe of a run. Open a log for its full table, the rivals and every fault.
-
RUN 01
Markets & Capital
Treasury: five Fiscal Data reads and a projection that knows when to stop
- Wire
- All five datasets answered. The debt fell $4.75bn in a day, and the ninety-day rate still read +$94,046 a second.
- Fault
- No data download, and about thirteen months of history.
- Rivals
- Fiscal Data, America's Finance Guide, FRED
-
RUN 02
Studio & Tools
Look-alike scanner: 294 fakes of paypal.com, and the registry asked about the taken ones
- Wire
- 294 unique candidates for paypal.com; 9 of 10 sampled names registered; paypa1.com held since 2000 via MarkMonitor.
- Fault
- Never looks at what a look-alike is actually serving.
- Rivals
- dnstwist, URLCrazy
-
RUN 03
Markets & Capital
Filings: the SEC's own wire, and the revenue tag Apple stopped using
- Wire
- Apple's Revenues tag held FY2018 alone; the alternate tag held FY2019–FY2025, and the page draws that one.
- Fault
- Insider rows are a 2026 Q2 snapshot, not live filings.
- Rivals
- SEC EDGAR Full Text Search, SECForm4.com, Stock Analysis
-
RUN 04
Diversions
Backgammon: 44 rule checks passed, and a computer that is only honest company
- Wire
- Rules self-test: 44 checks run, none failed.
- Fault
- A weak computer opponent and no game analysis.
- Rivals
- GNU Backgammon, Backgammon Galaxy
-
RUN 05
Studio & Tools
Portal: 179 desks, four panes, and a plain word for every blank
- Wire
- 179 desks on 14 shelves; 71 of them open in a new tab instead of a pane.
- Fault
- labs.llc pages only, in fixed equal panes.
- Rivals
- Vivaldi, Microsoft Edge
-
RUN 06
Live Intelligence
Airports: the FAA's status file, 27 seconds old, printed as written
- Wire
- FAA update 27 seconds old: 2 ground stops, 8 delay programmes, 3 closures.
- Fault
- FAA programmes, not flights: no cancellations.
- Rivals
- FAA National Airspace System Status, FlightAware MiseryMap
-
RUN 07
Live Intelligence
Docket: the courts at the free mirror, and a reading room that admits its gaps
- Wire
- Supreme Court decisions filed two days earlier; the full-text relay answered 501, no token.
- Fault
- Full opinion text hangs on a token we could not confirm.
- Rivals
- CourtListener, Google Scholar
-
RUN 08
Live Intelligence
Hanta: careful labels on a news watch that is not surveillance
- Wire
- 100 current stories through the relay in 0.62 s; a metadata-address probe refused.
- Fault
- No case counts; its 784-entry site pool holds only 437 unique hosts.
- Rivals
- HealthMap, CDC
-
RUN 09
Live Intelligence
Asteroids: a countdown only as precise as JPL is sure
- Wire
- 33 objects inside 0.05 au over 60 days; the closest 0.82 LD on 31 October.
- Fault
- Reads JPL's TDB times as UTC, about 69 seconds off.
- Rivals
- CNEOS Close Approaches, ESA NEOCC
-
RUN 10
Live Intelligence
Recall: five registers in one list, read straight from your browser
- Wire
- openFDA and the CPSC answered; FSIS refused our script with a 403, as the code predicts.
- Fault
- The lookup sees only the newest slice of each register.
- Rivals
- Recalls.gov, FDA
Reading a log
Seven legs, always in this order
Every run log follows the same route down a rule on the left of the page, so you can jump straight to the part you care about.
- 01BriefWhat the tool does, in plain words, and who it serves.
- 02WiringThe sources it reads, and whether the work happens in your browser or on a relay.
- 03Run tableEvery probe with its time, its status and what came back.
- 04FindingsThe lengths the tool goes to, each tied to a file and line.
- 05Against the fieldTwo or three named rivals, with what each does better stated first.
- 06FaultsWhat the tool does not do, or does worse than a rival.
- 07Sign-offWhat held, what fell short, when to reach for it and when not to.
No stars, no scores
Why a log instead of a rating
The people who write these logs also build the tools, so any number we pinned on them would be a number we gave ourselves. Instead each log publishes its evidence: when we looked, what came back, the line of source a claim rests on, and the faults. Where a rival does something better, the log says so before it says where our tool goes further.
Logs are dated to the minute on purpose. If a tool no longer behaves the way a row describes, either the tool has changed or we got it wrong, and the stamp tells you when we looked.